Apollo14 Landing Artifact

[[DMZ]Dave]

Apollo14 Landing Artifact

Apollo14 Landing Artifact site found by passing satellite you can clearly make out the tracks of the lunar vehicle on the surface and the Lem's platform, there have been widespread rumors and "Conspiracy Theories" that the Lunar landings were faked well this puts ALL of them to rest as the picture shows the truth.

I also have an image of Apollo 11 landing site so for me any doubt's planted in my thoughts are now gone the craft that took the pic's is not owned by the U.S. government, well done NASA on all lunar landings.

Apollo 17


Apollo 11
Might as well put in the rest.

[Gray]

LOL, it only puts a few of them down...besides which there is a plate on the bottom of 11'LEM thats been used to measure the distance between the Earth and the Moon for the past 40 years.

The strongest "conspiracy theory" still remains intact - the Landing were real, however the majority of media from said events was faked/altered (as supported by ANY media set from ANY of the landings - images clearly manipulated, audio/video cut and censored)

[[DMZ]Dave]

LRO- Lunar Recon Orbiter
http://lro.gsfc.nasa.gov/

For the first time in forty years we can now and finally see the craft on the surface of the moon, proof enough for me I hope in some near future expedition we will revisit those sites it would be good to see there foot prints.

[Age]

Not bad I do beleive it happened for all the problems that came up like those of Appollo 13.

[[DMZ]Dave]

Bering in mind the source and the fact they have been scrutinized by well known astronomers including Sir Patrick Moore of the pic's I can only conclude they are genuine.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/science/space/skyatnight/patrickmoore.shtml


It is possible that we will return perhaps to start the first moon base as for a reason the scientist's believe there may be water on the moon after all, given the most recent habitat project designed to test can we live togeather in a close enviroment such as a small moon base or long range exploration.

http://www.nasa.gov/audience/foreducators/son/habitat/index.html

It would be very cool if we put a manned moon base on the luner surface and there may be reason enough to go as this story would suggest.

Moon's interior 'did hold water'

By Paul Rincon
Science reporter, BBC News

US scientists have found evidence that water was held in the Moon's interior, challenging some elements of the theory of how Earth's satellite formed.


The glasses were created during volcanic events on the Moon


Orange lunar soil found by astronaut Harrison Schmitt in 1972

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/7497715.stm

Could be we might go back and with good reason and soon.

[Gray]

Oh I dont doubt these are real at all. I'm just saying as someone who knows a thing or two about photo manipulation, a very large chunk of the original Apollo mission photos have been tampered with.

[[DMZ]Dave]

Gray @ Fri Aug 07, 2009 10:42 am wrote:

Oh I dont doubt these are real at all. I'm just saying as someone who knows a thing or two about photo manipulation, a very large chunk of the original Apollo mission photos have been tampered with.

Maybe except these photos are new from the survey satillite.

[Age]

I still say it happened.

[Gray]

[DMZ]Dave @ Sat Sep 12, 2009 6:35 pm wrote:

Gray @ Fri Aug 07, 2009 10:42 am wrote:

Oh I dont doubt these are real at all. I'm just saying as someone who knows a thing or two about photo manipulation, a very large chunk of the original Apollo mission photos have been tampered with.

Maybe except these photos are new from the survey satillite.

As I said - I don't doubt that these are real at all. It is the original Apollo mission photos that I have serious doubts about.

[DisRuptor]

Probably to cut out the little green (or grey) men

[[DMZ]Dave]

Gray @ Sun Sep 13, 2009 4:02 am wrote:

[DMZ]Dave @ Sat Sep 12, 2009 6:35 pm wrote:

Gray @ Fri Aug 07, 2009 10:42 am wrote:

Oh I dont doubt these are real at all. I'm just saying as someone who knows a thing or two about photo manipulation, a very large chunk of the original Apollo mission photos have been tampered with.

Maybe except these photos are new from the survey satellite.

As I said - I don't doubt that these are real at all. It is the original Apollo mission photos that I have serious doubts about.

One would or should conclude that it did indeed happened regardless of any past conspiracy speculation, given the NEW photos would in my opinion end the matter once in for all. They did it!

[Gray]

[DMZ]Dave @ Fri Sep 25, 2009 6:24 pm wrote:

Gray @ Sun Sep 13, 2009 4:02 am wrote:

[DMZ]Dave @ Sat Sep 12, 2009 6:35 pm wrote:

Gray @ Fri Aug 07, 2009 10:42 am wrote:

Oh I dont doubt these are real at all. I'm just saying as someone who knows a thing or two about photo manipulation, a very large chunk of the original Apollo mission photos have been tampered with.

Maybe except these photos are new from the survey satellite.

As I said - I don't doubt that these are real at all. It is the original Apollo mission photos that I have serious doubts about.

One would or should conclude that it did indeed happened regardless of any past conspiracy speculation, given the NEW photos would in my opinion end the matter once in for all. They did it!

Again I defer to what I stated previously - Yes the moon landings happened, 100% unarguable solid incontestable fact (anyone with a half decent telescope can pick out the landing sites, and the base plate of Apollo 11 has been used constantly to measure the distance between the moon and the earth ever since it was put there [getting further away by the way])
It is the majority of the media broadcasted/distributed contributed to said events however, that is in serious doubt and in all probability manipulated and or faked, certainly at least the former.

What I am attempting to put across to you is the fundamental difference between an action, and the observation of that action. The two are not necessarily hand in hand the same - any magic show is testament to this.
One can be related or similar to the other, yet a completely different and separate entity.

The moon landings happened; for whatever reason the footage and stills from those missions released to the public is not 100% authentic.

- That has long been the strongest conspiracy theory behind the whole thing; further evidence of the landings occurrence is immaterial to that theorys claims.



And yes I have to agree no matter what, it is some feat. I can not even begin to doubt the courage of those men who went there, I mean come on, it's proven fatal to a good chunk or them (exposure to solar radiation whilst outside the best part of the Earths EM field has led to several cancer outbreaks, something I would wish on no one.)
Technologically speaking again just wow, it's equivalent to a cave man taking down an M1 Abrahams completely unassisted.
It's an astounding achievement and there's no knocking it, except it just doesn't all quite add up, close, but not quite.

[TheAlpha]

you know they say that Hirogens really landed there firsy!!

thats why we have craters onour faxes...we are related


mmuuuwwwahahahahahaha

btw

we were at the height of the cold war at that time, and the Soviets and Chinese were monitoring us on that mission actually a;; Apollo missions, and had they NOT happened, you bet ur darn skippy the Reds would've been all over that like flyss on crap......lol